Moon and Finger 13—the dog’s bollocks, and kigo
Welcome to Moon and Finger, a feature for addressing and discussing any haiku topic under the sun, in depth, but particularly haiku poetics. The feature is hosted by Orense Nicod and Keith Evetts, and will accommodate a variety of occasional guests. We aim to make it varied and challenging, serious and amusing. Host today is Keith Evetts.
Lost in Translation — the dog’s bollocks
Last week, Orense set out the many aspects of using or encountering unfamiliar words in a haiku in English. This week, some familiar words but in an unfamiliar conjuncture, leading to a discussion of various aspects of kigo.
A divagation:
One of over six hundred kigo for Spring in the saijiki of Japan’s Modern Haiku Association is “dog’s testicles,” more commonly “dog’s bollocks.” (いぬふぐり / inufuguri). This is, extraordinarily enough, the Japanese name for blue speedwell, Veronica persica, from the tiny, twin, hairy fruit:

The wild speedwell is one of the first flowers of spring.
Japanese haiku are full of double meanings. It’s several centuries since bawdy punning was quite prevalent in haikai, with some notable exceptions. And some in the anglophone haiku community nowadays might be a little put out by it. A translator writing “dog’s bollocks” in English would likely meet with mock horror or bewilderment. Most English translations of verses with that kigo are rendered sedately as “spring speedwell” or “blue speedwell.” There’s little option, but that can leave out rather a lot of association.
The poetic essence of inufuguri, a classic early spring kigo, rests primarily on the delicate or joyful rediscovery of life and vigour against a landscape emerging from winter:
— the sudden spark of early spring: because of its small flowers, its hon’i carries a comparison with stars (inufuguri hoshi no matataku gotoku nari “the inufuguri blooms look just like twinkling stars” —Kyoshi). Use of simile with gotoku: “like; as if.”
— resilience: creeping flat against the ground, it recovers from being stepped on.
— transience: its one-day flowers need the warmth of the spring sun to open.
— its vulgar name, which haiku poets also exploit as part of its essence, in various ways…
There are several examples in the saijiki:
魔女消える径いっぱいの犬ふぐり
majo kieru michi ippai inufuguri
—Nobuko Chiba
the witch disappears—
the path is filled with
blue speedwell
A mystical image where the witch is, by implication, disappearing winter.
Nobuko Chiba is a contemporary Japanese gendai haiku poet in a mode that came after the Hototogisu school – everyday weeds, domestic life, but intruded on by surreal or feminist figures.
There is a modern thread of zassō haiku (weed haiku), Taneda Santoka’s second favourite subject (“Sprouting, growing, blooming, seeding, and withering, just as weeds, nothing more—that is good.“). In 1936, he published Zassō fukei (Weedscapes). We have a recent “zassō haiku” by Peter Yovu, which was the subject of re:Virals 491.
While Santoka’s weeds are generally austere, lonely, resilient, withering, trampled, urinated upon, Chibo’s weeds here are energetically vigorous — but combined with folklore. It’s not just the return of natural growth in spring. There’s a human element in it—the path—and the vigorous speedwell fills it as the spirit-witch Yuki-onna, ethereal spirit of the snowstorm and freezing mountain heights, melts and vanishes with the spring thaw. Santoka’s zassō-damashii, the weed-spirit, diehard, resilient, and a little mischievous, takes over. Lost in translation is “dog’s bollocks”, which lends fertile vigour and maybe a touch of mischief to this haiku. The rites of spring: “the witch disappears / dog’s bollocks fill the path” doesn’t work for a reader in English. DeepL doesn’t do well with this one either: “Dogs and Scrotums All Along the Witch’s Vanishing Path”, although it might delight some readers with its seeming surrealism.
I think the matter might be partly solved in translation thus:
“the witch has vanished—
the path fills with
fertile speedwell
Note: inufuguri, speedwell: lit. ‘dog’s bollocks’ or ‘dog’s testicles'”
It is for consideration here whether the translator’s problem might be met by simply letting the unfamiliar word “inufuguri” stand:
“the witch has vanished—
the path fills with
inufuguri”
As we are translating, rather than creating anew, it seems to me preferable to give the reader a note rather than make them hunt down the Japanese word to make sense of the verse.
Then we have:
地球にも拍動のあり犬ふぐり
chikyū ni mo hakudō no ari inufuguri
—Seiichiro Watanabe
Earth too
has a heartbeat
spring speedwell
Seiichiro Watanabe b. 1950 in Shiogama, Miyagi, is a disciple of Satō Onifusa. Former editor of Ogumaza, author of several haiku collections and recipient of the Modern Haiku Association Award.
Again, lost in translation is the seminal notion of the fertile earth that might be inferred from inufuguri— these tiny vigorous wildflowers.
Another use:
老人性鬱的敬語いぬふぐり
rōjinsei utsuteki keigo inufuguri
—Yoshihiro Ishida (1924-2015, a prominent avant-garde poet)
senile melancholy
a polite form of address
spring speedwell
The melancholy of ageing is minimally compensated by formal respect for age, and possibly by the blooming of tough, resilient weed-flowers; yet lost in translation is the rueful, ironic “dog’s bollocks” that serves only to point up a loss of vigour, and in its rude good health contrasts with “honorific speech,” politeness.
senile melancholy
a polite form of address
dog’s bollocks!
And then:
いぬふぐり百年後にも基地置くか
inufuguri hyakunen go ni mo kichi oku ka
—Hiroko Yoshimi
spring speedwell—
a hundred years on
will the (military) base even stand?
Contrasting the fragility of this resilient, enduring little flower with the seemingly solid, massive force of military occupation, here the somewhat derogatory, mocking and resentful connotation of the “dog’s bollocks” is lost in translation, leaving only the somewhat cliché’d trope that nature continues renewed while human buildings crumble. There’s a semantic cut after “inufuguri,” dog’s bollocks. And a terminal cut with the interrogative kireji “ka.”
“dog’s bollocks / a hundred years from now / will there even be a base here?”
A frankly political haiku, mocking and (I sense) with a deliberate note of obscenity. Moreover, a fairly rare one extending into a future tense: “oku” — “to put or place”, with the ‘ku’ ending being the plain form, accommodating present and future. “A hundred years from now” forces the context into the future. Hiroko Yoshimi is an active contemporary haiku poet. She has several works in the database.
And so we have various uses of this one curious kigo:
—Fertility and renewal
—Irony and loss
—Mocking and derogatory, hinting at the obscene
…and there are several more uses in other examples, some of which do mean dog’s testicles or dog’s scrotum proper. All illustrating the power of association of a season word or term. And besides, the latent irony or humour that lies behind many a good haiku. Lost in translation.
The above serves for an illustration of awkwardness that can arise in the use of kigo from another culture. Although some readers of haiku written in English might study kigo and look up their hon’i or poetic essence, few in my experience actually do that, particularly if the extensive saijiki from which the kigo are drawn is in Japanese. Anglophone lists of season words tend to be much smaller and more limited, without the weight of example verses that develop their hon’i. To write a haiku in English that used “blue speedwell” or “spring speedwell” as a kigo might be technically “correct”, but for anglophone readers it would carry little or nothing of its poetic essence in a Japanese saijiki. Even though speedwell might appear in many of our lawns in spring and summer, it doesn’t strike me as a word bearing many pronounced associations in our own culture. Indeed, on looking that up, I get:
“In anglophone folklore and the language of flowers, blue speedwell symbolizes fidelity, loyalty, and safe travel, acting as a good luck charm meant to “speed you well” on a journey. Alternative folk names in regional British and Irish traditions include “bird’s-eye,” “cat’s-eye,” or the “eye of Christ”. Northern English superstition warned that picking them would provoke a bird to peck your eyes out.” Quite different.
I go on below to look at a reader’s specific question about double kigo, and then to think about more general questions concerning the use of kigo in English Language haiku.
—————-
Kigo questions—more than one per verse?
A reader writes in: “Recently, I noticed some haiku receiving awards in a competition that contained two similar kigo. I almost didn’t notice because the haiku flowed well and the images were vivid. Should it matter, or is redundancy an acceptable matter of choice?”
I think my personal opinion on this, for haiku poets writing in English, is that like any word, space, or punctuation mark in haiku, everything should carry weight. If removed, would that significantly detract from the verse? The difference might not be limited to meaning, but include rhythm or musicality. In some verses, repetition is deliberate and accumulates meaning. So, if you almost didn’t notice two kigo because the haiku flowed well and the images were vivid, that seems fine, at least to me, and evidently the judges thought likewise. Real redundancy is usually a flaw. But was there really redundancy in the verse that won an award, apart from using two words that happen to be formal kigo? Were they charged with different loads that made sense together?
Here’s a neat pedigree example from a renga:
Hokku (the opening verse):
蚤飛べよ おなじ事なら蓮の上
nomi tobe yo / onaji koto nara / hasu no ue
—Issa
jump flea!
might as well be
on to a lotus
Both flea, nomi, and lotus, hasu, are summer kigo. Both carry weight, for as David Lanoue, whose translation this is, comments in the journal Presence: “For a Pure Land Buddhist like Issa, a flea jumping onto a lotus blossom is symbolically realizing his own most deeply desired, most devout aspiration: to be reborn in Amida’s Pure Land and, once there, to achieve enlightenment. Even a flea, Issa suggests, can become a Buddha.”
The second verse, the wakiku, without a semantic break in it, should complement and buttress the first while moving the subject on a little. It should stay in the same season and tone as the hokku:
すずみ筵に入相の月
susumi mushiro ni / iriai no tsuki
—Kibõ
so cool on a straw mat
watching the sunset moon
Again, Lanoue’s translation. The straw mat suggests Buddhist meditation or zazen, often in the lotus position, consistent with the hokku but not repeating anything in it. There are two kigo here too, “cooling off” (susumi or suzumi) and “moon”, which without further specific qualification would default to autumn (ruled out at this point in the renga). “Cooling off” is the dominant kigo, and so the moon at sunset becomes just the ordinary moon that can be seen at many times of the year. Sunset is not of itself a kigo, although “sunset glow” (yūyake) is a summer kigo, so the inclusion of sunset modifies the default season of “moon” and slightly reinforces the essential summer season here. Kibõ is showing his haikai smarts.
Nothing in the above two verses seems redundant.
There is also the inescapable fact that while some teachers of anglophone haiku decree that you can’t have more than one kigo in a haiku, this ignores many famous hokku or haiku in Japanese, and some celebrated infamous ones, that do just that. Returning to the opening theme of this post, we have:
柿もぎの きん玉寒し 秋の風
akimogi no / kintama samushi / aki no kaze
—Ryokan Taigu
picking persimmons
my balls are cold
autumn wind
or:
Picking persimmons —
My testicles are frozen
By the autumn wind.
Tr. John Stevens
Persimmon is an autumn kigo, so is autumn wind, and so is “cold” —all consistent with autumn. (Stevens’ “frozen” would be winter, on its own). Three kigo in one verse.
Lost in translation is that “kintama” is literally “golden balls” —like the persimmons—and jocular slang for testicles. The Zen monk Ryokan had a mischievous sense of humour.
Not to mention Bashõ’s “Ah spring, spring / great spring! / And so forth“, a famous haiku in Japan with multiple kigo is:
目には青葉 山ほとゝぎす はつ松魚
me ni wa aoba / yama hototogisu / hatsu-gatsuo
— Yamaguchi Sōdō
the sight of green leaves
a mountain cuckoo
the first bonito
Three kigo for early summer. None redundant. Three parts, no kireji, two semantic cuts. Every word counts. This one appeared with a commentary in Haiku of the Day here.
Bashō has no compunctions about double kigo when it suits:
uguisu no / kasa otoshitaru / tsubaki kana
bush warbler’s / hat to drop / camellia!
or:
bush warbler
has dropped his hat
camellia
—tr. Reichhold
The bush warbler and the camellia are both early spring kigo. This is one of his later works (1689). Reichhold comments: “In earlier poetry, a favorite cliché was that the bush warbler was stitching a hat of plum blossoms. Camellia plants drop whole flowers rather than petals. The fallen flower seems as if it has been stitched together and therefore must be the hat of a bush warbler“.
One of Chiyo-ni‘s:
春雨や蓬を摘みに出たりけり
harusame ya / yomogi o tsumi ni / detari keri
—Chiyo-ni
Spring rain— / I had gone out to pick mugwort.
—tr. Donegan and Ishibashi
We had this one as an illustration of the English pluperfect in the Past Part 3. There are two kigo here: spring rain and yomogi —mugwort. Yomogi (one of the Artemisia genus) is an aromatic herb used in traditional Japanese sweets, soups and tempura. Also in herbal treatments, aromatherapy, and moxibustion. Its green shoots symbolise the renewal of spring, warming, sweet and arousing scents. This reads as a line from a notebook or diary about an actual event: there was spring rain, and she’d gone out to pick mugwort. I suggest that it would be somewhat daft to argue that she “can’t have” the two things in the same verse “because they’re both kigo and there’s seasonal redundancy.” Whereas indeed the two things complement each other beautifully: the gentle rain of spring, the green shoots of yomogi, its emerging fragrance, its sweetness and healing properties. The verse is about more than getting wet.
Buson has quite a few with more than one kigo, sometimes in different seasons; but one season is clearly the key one. His famous “rape blossom / the moon towards the east / the sun towards the west” is keyed to a late spring kigo, the canola blossoms. The sun would normally be symbolic of summer, the unqualified moon of autumn. Yet here they are planets, ostensibly observed at the same time.
You can find others by Buson with two harmonious, or with mixed, kigo:
山蟻のあからさま也白牡丹
Yama-ari no akarasama nari hakubotan
—Buson
a mountain ant stark on the white peony
or:
mountain ant— seen so clearly on the white peony
tr. Addis, Yamamoto, Yamamoto
Ant is an all-summer kigo; the peony is early summer. Addis and the Yamamotos have inserted an em dash, but there is no kireji or semantic cut in this verse, as far as I can see. but there is no kireji and only the slightest of semantic cuts in this verse, changing the perspective. One sentence fragment, two images (nikku ichishō pattern). Any gardener knows how attracted are ants to peonies! They go together. I suggest that neither kigo is redundant; they complement each other.
Also by Buson, the very interesting:
菜の花や 鯨もよらず 海暮ぬ
nanohana ya / kujira mo yorazu / umi kurenu
—Buson
菜の花 nanohana rapeseed (canola) blossoms — a late spring kigo
や ya the kireji (cutting word), for emphasis
鯨 kujira whale (a winter kigo)
も mo even or also
よらず yorazu does not approach/come near (classical negative of 寄る, yoru)
海 umi the sea
暮ぬ kurenu has grown dark / dusk has fallen (classical perfect form of 暮れる, kureru)
rapeseed blossom — not even a whale comes near, dusk has darkened the sea.
or:
A field of mustard flowers
no whales passed today
night falls on the sea
—tr. Merwin and Lento
A glowing foreground of blooms is cut with the kireji ‘ya’ to the great sea beyond. The absence of the world’s largest creature accentuates the vastness of the ocean, undisturbed. The mood changes from light (accentuated by the yellow) to dark: dusk is falling or has fallen.
Essentially, there are three separate elements arranged here, with one formal kireji and another semantic cut between yorazu and umi. The phrase kujira mo yorazu is complete in itself — even the whale does not come near. Umi kurenu remains within the absent whale’s domain but is also a self-sufficient statement — the (empty) sea has grown dark; dusk has fallen. The three parts operate on different planes: bright, living foreground, vast unpopulated space, time of day passing to a night that has darkened all (ending in a past / perfective tense). Brimming with yūgen — that sense of mystery. Trying consciously or unconsciously to hold these three elements in the mind and relate them paints a picture and yields poetic effect.
Nanohana, the canola blossom, is a late spring kigo; the whale a winter one. It doesn’t look like some direct observation from the notebook (any number of kigo from any season might be “absent”). The absent whale looks entirely like an imaginative compositional choice. Buson often composed imaginative verses at leisure away from the field. Now, it could be argued that the ‘absence of whale’ is not a kigo at all, and therefore there’s no double kigo and so no clash of seasons. However, we have no less an authority than Shiki, commenting on a different haiku: “it is also acceptable to treat the topic as a purely imaginary concept that does not exist in reality. For example, when given the autumn topic “covered in ivy”…as in
At the torii gate of the shrine in the fields, there was not even a trace of ivy —Ryōto
...it is acceptable not to include the actual object—in this case, ivy—in the haiku itself. This still qualifies as an autumn haiku.”
So, this is a verse where Buson deploys two kigo ordinarily from mixed seasons, expanding the boundaries of their use, using the blossom to fix the season and the poetic essence of the huge and absent whale in a non-seasonal way. Again, not redundant: each part adding to this complex verse, which would be diminished were any part taken away.
——————
Kigo from the perspective of haiku in English:
Seasonality and season-words (kigo) play a central role in classic Japanese haiku, but less of a role in anglophone haiku in the rest of the world. In Japan, a kigo gives both an anchorage in a given season or date —ideally the season in which the haiku poet is writing in the present moment— and some connection with past poems of various kinds stretching back to antiquity and which have used those kigo.
With each use, a kigo accumulates associations to go with its hon’i or ‘poetic essence.’ For example, the moon, snow, withered grasses, cherry blossoms, frogs, crickets, white chrysanthemums, and so forth, have acquired symbolic associations or “poetic essence” that can make a kigo a very economical means, in a very short form of poetry, of conveying a mood and a wealth of associations as well as setting a context. Thereby adding scope to a verse, more so when the reader is well-read in those former poems and able to “decode” the haiku in those terms. For less specifically educated readers, the poem may lose some intended meaning.
Kigo are not confined to seasons, nor to ‘nature.’ They may also be cultural: for example, marking various dates or celebrations, or domestic chores.
Some schools of haiku insist that to be a haiku, a verse ‘must’ contain a recognised kigo: that is, one that has been collected and codified in a saijiki. Strict adherence to codified kigo can, however, be very limiting for anglophone haiku and haiku poets, and sometimes verges on the absurd, particularly if borrowed from another culture or another time. For example, the fulling-block traditionally used in Japan to soften fabric by pounding, is in the saijiki as an autumn kigo. It would, I suggest, be of little meaning to a contemporary anglophone haiku poet and their general readers.
The establishment of a word — such as ‘moon’ — as denoting a single season (autumn in this case) is clearly at odds with the actual presence of the moon at all times of the year. The attribution of autumn is said to be because the full moon is at its biggest and brightest, although supermoons can occur in late summer or early winter (in 2026 three full supermoons fall, on January 3, November 24, and December 24). So we get devices such as ‘hazy moon’, assigned to spring, even though the moon may be veiled or hazy outside that season, and not ĥazy when the spring haiku is written. And ‘cold moon’ and so forth. The bones of a whale on the beach may be seen at any time of year. Yet ‘whale’ is officially a kigo for winter (in Japan). Off Cape Cod, it would be more likely to see whales in summer. In spring and autumn, geese both arrive and depart at the same time, depending on where they are from, or to where they are heading. In Japanese saijiki, “departing geese” is a kigo for spring, and “arriving geese” for autumn. The Thames estuary to bird migration is what Clapham Junction is to railway travellers coming and going all year round. Arbitrary insistence that a particular phenomenon must always denote a particular season, or even a micro-season, can weaken the credibility of kigo as a ‘must have’ outside the rigorous and deeply-entrenched traditional haiku in Japan.
Kigo also present some practical difficulties around the world. They do not travel well. In tropical countries the seasons are far less distinct, perhaps marked only by ‘dry’ and ‘wet’ seasons, or in the Caribbean by the hurricane season. Fruits and flowers may appear at almost any time of the year, or all through the year near the Equator. The arrival and departure of migratory birds in Africa may have more to do with the onset of cold weather in higher latitudes than with any seasonal change in that continent. There are from time to time attempts to create saijiki for different regions of the anglophone world, but they do not seem to attract many poets, and writing to them can become a sterile exercise more suited to the classroom than to the natural environment.
In recent years there is also the problem of marked climate change: not only does the season shift, but there can be conflicting ‘seasonal’ phenomena at the same time. One haiku poet has described hollyhocks blooming amid large flakes of snow. Is she to be admonished for depicting what is actually seen simply because of some arbitrary ‘rule’ about kigo?
In addition to these practical considerations, there is less of a tradition in English literature of writing in strict accordance with the seasons. Also, although there is a measure of intertextuality in anglophone poetry, it is rarer that a poem consciously references an earlier one in the conspicuous and frequent way in which haiku and tanka or waka in Japanese poetry do.
There are still many words that we can use without formal ‘kigo’ status that carry a weight of well-understood symbolism and association. There are many ways of referencing a season if a season is central to the poem. But why pin a verse arbitrarily to a season, whenever a season is not essential to the verse? Both in Japan and in the anglophone haiku community, the idea of ‘keywords’ has developed: that is, words or phrases that do not necessarily have to be seasonal, but which a majority of readers will recognise from their past usage, and that have some accumulated weight of symbolism or association. There is a newer tradition of ‘seasonless haiku’ (muki haiku) in Japan, although it remains controversial to inveterate traditionalists. Yet that led only to part liberation, and to five thousand codified expressions in a saijiki, many of them clumsy in English.
The essence, the ‘spirit of haiku’ prompts meditative perception in the poet, then the reader, usually through brief plain imagery, to arrive at some insight, revelation or reflection. The revelation may be one of beauty, or of humour; of sadness; or of fellowship, a novel view of a shared situation that others will recognise; and frequently but not always in a natural setting. A kigo or keyword is part of the toolkit for the anglophone haiku poet, but only one of a selection of tools. I contend that there should not have to be one as a matter of rule: only when it is important to the verse’s content — when it adds significance to the poem, or is needed as shorthand for a bunch of associations relevant to the poem. Short of a recognised kigo or keyword, a seasonal reference or allusion of some sort, if it is needed, may be perfectly adequate. In any case, this is one of the ways new kigo come into being and get adopted. Simply shoehorning a ready-made season word into a verse because you are ‘supposed’ to have one seems to me to be misguided and inauthentic in this spare poetry. At least, as far as concerns English Language Haiku where the available saijikis are somewhat exiguous, rarely give past haiku exemplifying the kigo’s poetic essence, and often contain kigo borrowed from Japan or from another region alien to the poet.
In traditional Japanese haiku, and more recently among authorities in the teaching of English Language haiku, having more than one season-word or image in a verse may be frowned upon. This issue has been addressed at length above. If one of the words is clearly the dominant season word, then that is acceptable. If two (or more) words that happen to be season words add different, meaningful, associations to a verse and are not redundant, there are plenty of classic precedents. Each adds something to the verse, which would be diminished if either of them were to be taken out.
There may also be cases when the poet observes things from different seasons in the same temporal context. These days we have asparagus tips in the greengrocer’s nearly all year round. We’ve had daffodils bloom before Christmas in our southern English garden, along with the last yellow rose of the past summer. Are we to say that the haikuist should censor a natural observation, experienced directly, to remove these supposed conflicts of season? Occasionally the very point of a haiku offering insight into climate change will be strengthened by a conflict of seasonal words. If a poet writes from the real and present moment, when all the images around are consistent with reality, if not always with a doctrinaire abstraction of reality, that surely cannot be seen as wrong.
In sum, I think that for haiku in the English language, understanding what kigo and keywords are for, and deploying them where they are truly useful as part of the content and add significantly to a verse (which they often do), but not otherwise, is a better approach than writing haiku strictly by long lists of such things required by formality, by doctrine. But I come from a society that has grown less hierarchical and orderly. I prefer to think that a notebook is all that should be needed to write haiku. Not an almanac.
If you’ve read this far, some fun:
世界中が五月だったぼくは無季
sekai-jū ga gogatsu datta boku wa muki
—Tsugio Kawana (b. 1935)
throughout the world / the fifth month it was / as for me, without a season
all over the world
it was May
I was kigo-less
tr. Alex Fyffe
“Lacking a season” is “muki,” seasonless, as in “muki haiku,” haiku without a (formal) kigo.
Interesting choice of the past tense (datta). There’s a neat temporal asymmetry to go with the irony of it being May yet without a kigo. Although the first part is explicitly in the past “it was May”, the second part, “as for me, muki” is without tense, leaving the temporal status open to either “I am…” or “I was…”
tax season
assuming that’s
a kigo
Sondra J. Byrnes
Failed Haiku vol 9 issue 100 June 2024
—–
Key points:
—kigo are natural or other words that fix a season or date, that appear in a saijiki with examples to illustrate their accumulated hon’i or poetic essence.
—they are not merely part of a tradition: they are an economical way of bringing a bundle of known associations into a very short verse and extending its depth.
—if the general readership is not acquainted with the same saijiki and examples of poetic essence, some intended meaning is likely to be lost.
—while in classic haiku normally there will be only one word or phrase that is a kigo, that is a pragmatic consideration but by no means an inviolable ‘rule.’
—there are impeccable precedents for more than one kigo. Where there’s more than one, one will usually be the dominant seasonal kigo by context.
—each word, space, cut, or punctuation in a haiku should be worth its weight, and essential in some way to the verse. This applies to multiple kigo as much as to anything else.
—the Japanese have a strong tradition of writing poetry tied to the season, and alluding to earlier works. Anglophone poetry much less so.
—kigo from one region, country or hemisphere don’t often travel well.
—attempts to compile saijiki for anglophone regions have been very limited in comparison with Japan. Usually a comparatively small number of approximate seasonal words are given without the accumulated examples of use that illustrate their ‘poetic essence.’
—climate change and international food and flower supply chains have complicated the seasonal situation.
—outside the classroom and the formalist community, there has been limited adoption by ELH poets of kigo specific to a region, despite worthy attempts. They are more likely to borrow Japanese kigo in lieu. (That doesn’t always migrate well, as with “inufuguri — dog’s bollocks”).
—some of the rigid aspects of formal kigo can call into question their credibility with anglophone poets.
—anglophones have taken more to key words and phrases that are fairly universal and have known associations, without the formalities of a saijiki, to anchor their verses and give depth to them. This is more flexible, much broader, allows more freedom, and invites creativity.
—writing from a notebook, recording real and present observations, is a good way of marrying accuracy to consistency with the time and season. The notebook should take precedence over the almanac.
—Keith Evetts
We keep reader proposals anonymous so there is no pressure on those who contribute ideas, but if the author of the proposal wishes to reveal they suggested the topic, that is, of course, welcomed.
The polls on Past Tense in Haiku will close on Thursday. If you haven’t taken them yet we’d appreciate you adding your voice to next week’s Chorus.
The Past part 1, part 2, part 3 : TAKE THE POLL

At the end of each post you will find a short anonymous poll related to the topic of the week (3 or 6 questions).
It asks not what you know about haiku but what you experience reading and writing it — whether an argument lands, whether a poem does what the essay claims it does, whether your practice matches the orthodoxies you’ve been taught. There are no correct answers. A no or a not yet is as valuable as a yes, and more valuable than a performance of agreement.
Periodic issues titled Chorus will return to what the polls have gathered — not to tally verdicts but to examine what the pattern of responses reveals. Where readers converge is interesting. Where they diverge is often more so. The more poets who participate the richer the picture.
Discussion is welcomed in the Comments thread at the very end of this post. Meanwhile, if you would like to propose a topic you wish to see addressed, or better still, if you have an outline proposal for an article that you would be prepared to write—if accepted—please submit it to us via the submission form immediately below this text:
Why Moon and Finger? Zen, Chan, and Indian Buddhist texts cite the metaphor of a Finger pointing at the Moon with a caution: do not mistake the finger for the moon itself. Clinging to words or doctrines (the finger) obscures the awakened mind or truth (the moon). Thus, the analyses, views, and critiques of haiku in this feature are but the Finger. Haiku is the Moon itself, to be viewed by all. Views expressed here are those of the individual authors alone, except where otherwise attributed. They are very much open to discussion in the comments thread below. We all learn.
Introducing the hosts:
Orense Nicod is a French poet working across forms, with a particular focus on haiku. Born in Paris, she spent ten years of her childhood in South Africa before returning to France and writes in both French and English.
Her work has appeared in journals including Frogpond, Cattails, and The Asahi Haikuist Network. She has twice won first prize in the Haiku Society of America Rengay Awards, in collaboration with Joan Fingon (2021) and Anton R-kelian (2025).
A former teacher, she is raising her two children and her poetic expectations while co-hosting Moon and Finger with Keith Evetts on The Haiku Foundation.
Keith Evetts lives in Thames Ditton, Surrey. Life Fellow of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Aside from scientific papers, diplomatic telegrams, and local history articles, he’s written poetry of various kinds for sixty years, much of it sub rosa. Latterly host and managing editor of the Foundation’s re:Virals commentary feature since December 2021, one of the ten editors of the annual Red Moon Anthology, and an administrator of Facebook’s largest haiku group. Married with five grown children, cottage garden, grey parrot, and a sense of humour. His short haiku bio is here.
Comments: further discussion is invited below. Comments will close when this post is automatically archived.
A note on the comments: Once a discussion reaches more than 20 comments, we’ll use NEW tags🆕️ to make recent activity easier to follow. Keith and I will mark the latest comments so that readers who are following the conversations closely can quickly see where the discussion is currently active.
The tags are not personalized to individual readers; they simply indicate the most recent additions to the discussion. Because we’re doing this manually, there may sometimes be a delay before a new comment is tagged. Depending on how active a discussion is, we’ll generally mark the five most recent comments, and in more active discussions this may extend to the ten most recent.
The NEW tag🆕️ is a navigation aid, not an editorial judgment about the importance or quality of a comment.
THF strives to maintain a safe and friendly environment for our readers and site participants. Participation in our offerings assumes respectful and appropriate behavior of all parties. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone, for any reason, at any time.
If you see something you feel may violate our Code of Conduct, please report it to the appropriate moderator (the host of this post) or the President here.
Comments (43)
Comments are closed.
🆕️As this week’s discussion has stalled, I thought I might hazard an intervention.
Here is a series of statements made by a poet-critic almost one-hundred-years ago:
“…the contemporary poet […] is forced to ask himself such questions as ‘what is poetry for?’ [and] ‘how and to whom am I to say it?’ We have to communicate–if it is communication, for the word may beg the question–an experience […]. If poetry is a form of ‘communication’, yet that which is to be communicated is the poem itself, and only incidentally the experience and the thought which have gone into it. The poem’s existence is somewhere between the writer and the reader; it has a reality which is not simply the reality of what the writer is trying to ‘express’, or of his experience of writing it, or of the experience of the reader…”
Three of this week’s commenters have mentioned they don’t really think about kigo when composing. So, some questions we might ask, in regard to this fact in relation to the above quotation, are:
1) Are kigo integral–or incidental–to the poet’s experience?
2) Are there then readers who experience a kigo and its supposed effects where none has been intentionally included by the poet? What should we think of such responses?
3) In regard to last week’s topic, are kigo in ELH anything more than vocabulary which create an ‘unnecessary’ state of ‘inaccessibility’ for most readers?
4) Are ELH poets really addressing a readership at all when they compose?
🆕️1. Kigo may be either incidental or integral to the experience of the poet. I think there is enormous diversity in practice with Kigo.
2. Unintentional meaning find is ubiquitous in poetry. This includes kigo. The best poems create multiple interpretation. An “unintentional” kigo experience in a reader is a testament to the skill of the poet.
3. Good haiku should be good poems first. A kigo can always be interpreted at the literal level. A tulip is merely a tulip first—the tales on symbolic, allegorical, mythic, archetypal etc. meaning.
4. I am not personally addressing a readership beyond myself. I am, however, delighted when someone reads and like one of my poems. Writing for an audience is the death of inspiration.
🆕️Kigo are incidental where they just happen to appear in a haiku, but when they do appear they are integral. I cannot separate the two.
I am sure there are effects of kigo just as anything intertextual, even if it occurs by happenstance.
Stylistically, I prefer a kigo or seasonal reference. But what is inaccessable, the knowledge of previous uses? A kigo adds different things to different readers, key words and ‘keywords’ likewise.
I write for myself but like to think that others can get something from my scribbling
🆕️Good questions, M.R.!
With the caveat that I don’t think there are Kigo in ELH, as they are a specific liminal zone. I think ELH operates rather with “keywords” (which I wish that was a cooler term that “keywords,” how boring!)
1. Keywords are integral
2. Keywords carry connotative and symbolic weight that extend further than a writer can fully know within any given haiku.
3. Keywords should/are simultaneously shallow and deep, accessible and inaccessible (or rather thus at first blush)
4. Haiku poets are addressing not a reader, but are “addressing the poem itself,” and in that addressing the poem comes to be.
🆕️ Interesting questions. I commented on the vital questions for a creative writer—why we write, and for whom—in an earlier post. In my case, I have written poetry primarily for myself, for perceptual attention and deepening, for the mental exercise, for the distraction, and occasionally for that late-night feeling of exaltation. It’s only very recently that I took the trouble to submit anything, and after that first flush I’ve come increasingly to feel that is a chore. So only lately has that been for Eliot’s reasons of communication (as I recall, he was writing that mainly about theatre, where communication with the audience is obviously key). Nevertheless, I think that where poets do seek publication, communication is a strong reason. In the case of haiku, there is a tradition of ‘sharing,’ too. But also a tradition of not communicating ‘everything,’ instead deliberately leaving space for a reader to enter and either re-create of co-create. The notion of co-creation rather muddies the waters of communication.
On the specific questions:
1)Are kigo integral–or incidental–to the poet’s experience?
It depends on what the poet is experiencing (outdoors in ‘nature’ or in society on a marked festivity such as New Year). We need to distinguish carefully between formal kigo and ‘seasonal words.’ Quite often I write from real and present experience—the notebook. And so, quite often there will be a word or two relating to the season that is quite naturally in the poem.
If we mean “season words” then that brings up the question of whether we anglophones adopt from the Japanese tradition, as an essential part of ‘haiku,’ that they be situated in a ‘season.’
2) Are there then readers who experience a kigo and its supposed effects where none has been intentionally included by the poet? What should we think of such responses?
A good question, touched upon by my mention of saijiki as ‘codebooks’, and ‘decoding’ haiku. If a reader is not working to the same codebook, there’s a loss of intended meaning. The first time I read (in translation) many classic haiku, when I first took an interest in the genre, I thought they were short of meaning and didn’t pass my beginner’s “so what?” test. In many cases, the missing elements were my minimal knowledge of kigo, and also of Japanese (and Chinese) thought, philosophy, and ‘aesthetics.’ Nowadays, I get far more from the classics.
Conversely, as you suggest might be the case, a haiku written by someone who is unaware of a word’s codified role as a kigo in a saijiki might find their haiku interpreted in a different way by a reader who is alert and versed in kigo.
3) In regard to last week’s topic, are kigo in ELH anything more than vocabulary which create an ‘unnecessary’ state of ‘inaccessibility’ for most readers?
I think that they are, or can be, more than that, if you mean kigo proper rather than seasonal references, but only if the readership is educated in haiku and working to the same ‘codebook.’ Otherwise, it’s not that kigo render a verse ‘inaccessible’ for most readers, but that the majority will simply read that word or phrase at its generally-understood level of meaning. And I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that. I’m easy about kigo and about seasonality in ELH. As a subject, and as a way of thinking and an aid to understanding haiku, it’s interesting and useful. As a writer and a reader, I am much more interested in the content, the insight, and the poetic or visceral or musical effect of a verse than in nailing its precise form to the blackboard.
4) Are ELH poets really addressing a readership at all when they compose?
If you rephrased this to “Are ELH poets really addressing a readership at all when they publish” the answer would surely be yes. But drawing on my particular life’s experience, my own answer is no, when I compose, I’m doing it for myself. Haiku as “a way” and a practice, and not, for me, an activity with literary aims or pretensions. I do enjoy reading the verses of others who distinguish themselves in that sphere, however. Far more than reading my own, which tend to go off after a few days, like fish.
COMBINING KIGO
WRT using multiple kigo, Shirane writes, in Japan and the Culture of the Four Seasons, “In short, the summer book of the Kokinshū cobines the image of the hototogisu with those of the tachibana and samidare to create an emotionally textured landscape associated with love, memory, and depression.”
When I think of the combination of kigo, or any symbolic system, I think of macro-symbolic values and micro-symbolic values. The symbolic value of Summer, in Japanese poetry is macro, while kigo are micro. The dynamic between macro and micro can result in very interesting poems. As well, the slight alteration in a micro can have different effects on a haiku.
For example,
A couple of micro-symbols, like “X” and “Y,” in their play with the macro-symbol of “A” leads to result “1.”
However, if one substitutes one of the micro-symbols to “W” (rather than “Y”), and now “X” and “W,” are in the play with “A” resulting in “2.”
A red rose in combination with rooster in Spring has some possible results. However, a red rose with a buzzard in Spring has different results.
In may way haiku are like these symbolic tinkering machines (Legos?) that poets can build and replace parts to lead to different results.
ALLUSION in ELH
I would push back a little on this statement, “the Japanese have a strong tradition of… alluding to earlier works. Anglophone poetry much less so.”
Prior to c. 1940’s (give a take a generation), anglophone poetry was still very allusive to past literary works. It seems it took WWII the solidify the trend of severing connection with allusive qualities, c.f. with the Beats and Confessional poetry, etc, it was then that a tetherless poetry caught on and allusions and past-grounding poetry sort of disappeared. In general, at a wide historic level, anglophone poetry was more likely than not to be full of allusion and grounded in reader’s knowing past works of literature.
Granted intertextuality and T S Eliot’s seminal essay, and granted also that the educated poets in the English tradition loved to quote the likes of Homer and other Greek and Latin poets, I think there is far less tradition in English poetry of drawing directly on lines used by other poets that went before, than there is in Japan’s short poems that are often quite tightly and conspicuously bound to previous works. It’s a question of degree, as usual, rather than absolutes.
I agree, rather than “drawing directly on lines,” the tradition of English poetry was allusion to whole work, or at least larger components…maybe because the works in general tended to be longer that waka.
SYMBOLIC V. LITERAL
Hokku/haiku from the get-go was a highly symbolic verse form. An early misstep of ELH was vwieing Japanese haiku as literal, rather than highly symbolic. Which has resulted in the some of the “rules” (read: misunderstanding of shasei-based approaches to ELH). As more ELH embrace the symbolic realms of haiku, I think a struggle arise for some ELH writes on how to clue a reader into viewing a particular haiku AS symbolic. i.e. trying to move the reader past attempts to read a poem literally, or at least not exclusively as a literal piece of art.
Adam: I tend to agree. Blyth even wrote that haiku definitely did not contain symbolism (though it would take me some time to find the exact wording and ref in his books). But very evidently, it often (but not always) does, and kigo are perhaps the prime example to begin with.
“Last of all, it is necessary to state with some vehemence
that haiku is not symbolic, that is, not a portrayal of
natural phenomena with some meaning behind them.”
A History of Hailku Volume 1, R.H. Blyth
simonj: thanks. That’s the very quote indeed.
Sometime Blyth makes some cringy, face/palm statements.
An old boss of mine once said that the first draft is always the hardest. Blyth was at putting down this material for the first time in English. At least he was taking a position—so that others could rebel against it (as a community, we might need a bit more rebelling).
jisei, of course, immediately conjure symbolism.
Keith, I want to come back to something you hint at in the essay. I’m not sure the distinction between a “season word” or “seasonal reference” and a kigo ultimately makes much sense. Kigo don’t simply pop into existence as kigo: they begin as seasonal references and, through use and accumulated associations, acquire kigo status. So when a poet uses a seasonal reference that isn’t yet a recognised kigo, are they violating some rule of “traditional haiku” by not using a kigo—or are they using a kigo in the making? To me, the latter seems the more useful way of looking at it.
Orense:
I think this is an area where understandable academic attempts to define and pigeonhole things can instead create doubt and confusion.
We have the saijiki, containing formally defined kigo together with examples of their use that develop their poetic essence. Not only an almanac, but essentially a codebook. Only of much use if the recipient knows and uses the same codes.
We have the kiyose, which is a simpler list of seasonal words of use in haiku but which, as I understand it, does not elaborate on the accumulated poetic essence nor contain example poems illustrating that. This seems to be what the anglophone attempts to replicate ‘saijiki’ look like. They are more like helpful guides or suggestions to anchor a poem in a season. Less rigorous, perhaps. Coarser-grained.
As to how a word or phrase graduates to the status of an ‘approved’ seasonal word, well, that brings up the question of who is doing the compiling and what authority they have. And whether we should regard their compilation as a rigid structure within which haiku composition ‘must’ or ‘should’ take place, or more of a collection of helpful, suitable prompts (I favour the latter, of course). I don’t know who first began collecting and ‘approving’ kigo in Japan. Anyone know?
There arise several phrases in contemporary anglophone haiku that strike other poets as notable, and that are then ‘borrowed’ for verses that exploit and develop the phrase. This is surely how ‘kigo’ or ‘keywords’ develop naturally in the haiku community without being formally codified. I can think of two right off the bat that haven’t been picked up and developed. One is Jennifer Hambrick’s “glass rain”, and the other is Carol Jones’ “winnow wind” (which is marvellous and clearly autumn). They seem good candidates. I suppose we might add the frequently-used “petrichor” (late spring / summer), “murmuration”, and now “komorebi”…. And if they are picked up and developed naturally, because they have accumulated associations and are useful, then why compile them into an approved list? For people of a certain propensity may then take that list as definitive and limiting.
Latterly, Alan Peat and others solicited suggestions for a modern anglophone saijiki, but as far as I recall the initiative died out after some initial enthusiasm. We are left with “creeping sepia”, appropriately enough!
I think that an agreed reference list can be useful for renku–a form where rules abound and discipline is essential, enforced by a sabaki (and still a most enjoyable game, to a considerable extent because of the rules). But as for standalone haiku, I much prefer a notebook, and to let the surroundings be the prompt.
Otherwise, it will be interesting to find out from the polls how our poets regard kigo or season words…
And as we think for ourselves, the whole subject brings up the questions for anglophones in our own poetic traditions:
–Why have a season? Is it just because of a tradition honoured in Japan? Is it essential always, or just fitting sometimes?
–Does a haiku have to be predominantly about ‘nature’, and what exactly is ‘nature’? Aren’t humans a part of nature too? Our cities just anthills? Our love of trees shared by orang-utans…
–does a saijiki or a kiyose foster creativity within a rigid framework, or inhibit it?
WRT, “This seems to be what the anglophone attempts to replicate ‘saijiki’ look like.”
I think an interesting (futile?) project would be to take Reichhold’s “Dictionary of Haiku” and include in it past Western literature mentions of the mood, flowers, occasions, and the rest of the categories applies to the Seasons. In this way the “tradition” of a particle flower, mood, occasion, etc, is demonstrated. Granted, it wouldn’t be past haiku, but it would move closer to demonstrating a lineage of using a particular object in a particular manner.
Interestingly, in MH 57.2, Jennifer Hambrick discusses Cherie Hunter Day’s
hold your glass against the syllable rain
As an aside, and for it is worth (not much) when I am writing something in the neighborhood of haiku, I give zero consideration
to kigo. Even so, I do find the following, offered by Lee Gurga in his Normative Haiku and Beyond essay, interesting:
a quote on the seasonal image in haiku from Kuriyama Shigehisa,
from the Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan:
In a poem where the seasonal theme fulfills its true evocative function, the
season expands the scope of the haiku and creates a background of associa-
tions for the specific scene, while the specific scene points out a characteris-
tic yet often forgotten aspect of the season and thus enriches our understand-
ing of it
Peter,
I have a couple of questions if you wouldn’t mind answering them:
First, what is interesting about that Gurga quote?
And second, why do you say your aside on giving zero attention to kigo when you’re writing “something in the neighborhood of haiku” isn’t worth much?
I also give zero attention to kigo.
Thanks,
M
M.R.P,
It should have looked like this:
As an aside, and for what it is worth (not much): when I am writing something in the neighborhood of haiku, I give zero consideration to kigo.
It is interesting to me because I like the idea, not only as it may happen in poetry, that two things can be in conversation with each other, reveal each other, open each other and create each other.
P.S.
“zero consideration” is by no means meant to be a commentary on those who find
a lot of value in the exploration of kigo.
I think the rules of renku have a similar problem to the rules of haiku. When we enforce them without exception, the form rapidly becomes moribund.
I think the use of traditional kigo in a renku is the most problematic for me because I have little connection to the ebb and flow of Japanese seasons. I can however, tell you that in Pennsylvania, dame’s rocket is done blooming before the chicory blooms or that white-tail deer roam closer to town once the corn fields are harvested. In other words, my poems are far more vital when I am using seasonal referents that I actually experience than formal kigo from a saijiki.
.
I agree with Joshua. Formal kigo are both Japanese and centralised for Kyoto and Edo (Tokyo) from the classic times, and pre-Industrial Japan.
I’d love to see both modern and contemporary (1960s-1990s and 2020s) Japanese kigo outside of those cities, one a former capital of Japan and one is currently still the capital of Japan.
Japan. is also many islands, so it would be of more interest, ever more so in dynamic climate alteration, to witness kigo from areas that are not dissimilar to wherever we live.
EXAMPLE:
The island of Kyushu in southwestern Japan could be compared to Cornwall and South West England (UK) due to its dramatic rugged coastlines, peninsular geography, outdoor adventure culture, and relaxed seaside atmosphere!
my winter coat
for two hours in between…
quasi-seasonal sneeze!
Alan Summers
uncurated
.
Joshua: all going to support the view that the notebook and reality take precedence over the saijiki and some doctrinaire abstraction of it?
On renku, I had in mind the international ones run at THF, where the tendency has been to give participants an existing online list of season words, as something shared to work with, rather than have clashes of hemispheres and latitudes where each participant has a different local season and, unrestrained, a worldwide mix of plausible seasonal phenomena — which I confess I would find interesting and exciting, but difficult for a sabaki to manage, given that poets are difficult enough to corral.
🆕️This is hard no doubt. When I have led a renku that was broader than just my wife and I (when it’s just us, we co-lead, of course), it is hard to keep the poets on the straight and narrow. I tend to defer much more to “does this make for good poetry” than “are my seasons exactly precisely right” when making decisions.
I will also speak out of the other side of my mouth to say that when I do see some seasonal snafu, I totally fixate it on it much more than I should and I do call it out (in my head of course) as a significant error. Something like—no, no robins return to my feeders after the crocuses have put up new leaves but before they have budded—that sort of things. So when renku’ing, it has to be a really good line to make me want to keep something out of order—usually we just redo the section if we want to keep it.
🆕️Hi Joshua,
With this Canadian/USA/UK in person renku at a train station near to me (could repeat this in Chippenham one day too) Marshall Hryciuk & Karen Sohne very kindly wanted/invited me to be sabaki! Of course I declined, I had them, plus I had to explain to the train station staff why so many people wanted to use the station but not any trains!
The mix was a handful of haiku experts (and Sue Shand really knows her renku, we worked on other projects in South West England) plus other kinds of poets, and also novelists and children’s poetry writers and musicians:
https://area17.blogspot.com/2009/04/bath-spa-train-station-renga-party.html
Proud to say we were more than just two genders present. A long day, which is why I focused on hospitality, access, breaks including a shopping break and museums where Karen Hoy went with Andrew Shimield’s wife, as she wasn’t a poet!
_____________________________________
Scribing Lines
The Bath Spa Railway Station Renku
_____________________________________
https://area17.blogspot.com/2009/04/bath-spa-train-station-renga-party.html
The trick with renku is the interplay, and the memories. I remember Mike Keville rescuing a renku we couldn’t complete, and it was already 4am in the morning, with a London bicycle cocktail bar anecdote on another occasion.
What we see in the final printed renga or renku is about a tenth of what went on, and though seasonal references and classical kigo are important, it’s the participation.
John Carley was especially good at this via email:
https://www.hsa-haiku.org/frogpond/2013-issue36-2/renku.html
I remember the discussions with John in various renku rather than just the renku down in print.
Both Marshal/Karen and John made it effortless to get us all working together though a lot of skill was behind it all of course! (smiles)
Alan
Joshua,
If you don’t mind my asking, I am curious if you have a personal ‘rule’ of including seasonal referents in your haiku or if it is more the case that such seasonal referents are simply serendipitous elements of your haiku? In other words, do you both take them and leave them (as they arise or not) in the composition of a poem?
Thanks,
M
🆕️At this point, I give seasonal referents zero consideration when composing haiku. Considering and including kigo was an excellent way to learn the form when Infirst started writing haiku in 2021. I do try to give editors the respect they deserve when they are collecting seasonal issues—so I will consider it when I submit work.
Fantastic essay—as always.
Thankfully, English also has some double entendre flora: morning glories, referencing a certain tumescence at cockcrow as well as Chiyo-no’s trademark flower, long purples (and all their synonyms. See Hamlet, of course), and one I just discovered Clitoria, the butterfly pea etc.
Joshua: Thank you.
re: morning glory… Ah, yes. This was one of my selections for commentary in LEAF issue 4, 2024:
—–
late night morning glory menopause blues
—Kelly Sargent
“There’s no subject that cannot be addressed in haiku. Here we have an ambivalent, delicately-worded verse where the reader must do some work to discover a meaning. The flower morning glory doesn’t bloom late at night, but romance often does … and another use of “morning glory” in common parlance is as a homely euphemism for an erection. The usual blue of the flower is reflected in “the blues” of menopause, when it is not uncommon for a woman’s sexual desires to diminish or disappear, and physiological changes, such as the shrinkage of Bartholin’s glands, impede lubrication of the wheels of love. Statistics suggest that one in three women go off sex altogether, and it can be difficult for a loving couple to navigate the consequences. I don’t recall other verses addressing this sensitive issue: well done, and with a light touch.”
—–
…..add it to the hon’i of the morning glory…
re: double-entendre flora:
There is also a wealth of Japanese haiku concerning the pine mushroom and ‘mushroom hunting.’ Mushroom hunting is another autumn kigo that acquired bawdy associations. The subject would have caused titters in the salons of Edo. One look at the pine mushroom with its glans-like cap will tell you why. Even Chiyo was not above a sly wink:
羽織を松に着せて茸狩
はおりをまつにきせてたけがり ちよ
haori o matsu ni kisete takegari
–Chiyo
my jacket draped on a pine mushroom hunting
How innocent…
Somewhat more obvious is:
茸取って大声あぐる女かな
take totte oogoe aguru onna kana
– Shiki
getting a mushroom a woman lets out a great shout!
or:
shouting out
with each mushroom bagged
the huntresses
–tr. Robin D. Gill
….Shiki’s sketch from life….
You also mentioned the fulling block (kinuta), which is literally the instrument for pounding the bed linen.
night-fulling – my wife has big baps Issa
How naughty of Issa. I know that our beloved Issa has one very crude and bitter verse, that I won’t give here: too grim. But he also has:
her moon comes round
so we go moon-viewing
with the dog
Which if I recall it right, is another of Robin Gill’s translations. And with Issa-like mischievous humour, and two mentions of ‘moon’…..
I don’t think you can translate the first poem in three lines. Blue speedwell doesn’t arouse the same emotions in us as it does in Japanse. Just like “Remember Alamo” doesn’t arouse the same emotions in Japanese as it does in Americans. If you are willing to be shot to pieces, you might try to just capture the feeling and translate it to something like
The witch disappears
the hairy balls
of Veronica
Love that translation. Well done!
John: an enterprising translation! May I put “Veronica” in italics to give a reader who hasn’t read this particular post a clue that it is a species name? For I think we should somehow keep the essential part that this is a plant, as well as embodying the seminal fertile aspect. An example of an Unfamiliar Word, the Latin…
The witch disappears
the hairy balls
of Veronica
Thanks, Keith. I appreciate your point, but I think we’d lose more than we would gain. We’d restrict the reader to reading it in just one way, as a flower.
The fun in doing it my way is that it can be read either as a flower or as a woman’s name. True, if the reader doesn’t know that in botany “Veronica” is the name of the genus of speedwells, he or she will miss the reference to the flower. But even so, he or she can look it up, or if not, still get some kick out of the incongruous combination of woman and testicles. To me, in this haiku that is half of the fun.
I personally love strange kigo—the stranger, the better. And dog’s bollocks is just wonderful. 😂
We have lots of folk names for common native plants, and some of them extend between continents. Love-in-a-mist (nigella) for example. Blooms late spring early summer. Or my favourite despised weed that I grow:
ivy-leaved toadflax
if they knew your real name
cymbalaria muralis
would they treat you
the same?
(I just love saying “cymbalaria muralis”. Such a lovely name, that rolls round the tongue.)
I love it too. It grows in the cracks in the pavement in Paris, and I used to grow it on my balcony as well. One of its French vernacular names is Ruine de Rome, which I find suitably poetic. 😄