Hi Peter,
It depends on what you mean, from what approach etc...
For me I come from it as a reader first, like Joe or Jo Public; then an informed reader (I hope so after close study of haikai literature for almost 20 years); as a fellow editor; and as an advocate of haikai as a literary form, and supporting a publication which acts as an ambassador for what haiku is, for what it can be, for furthering its direction, as no literary form can stand still.
Of course we have great examples of past history from Classic Japan, and 575 syllable haiku practitioners like O. Mabson Southard, and the list goes on. But its strength, in my opinion, rightly or wrongly, lies in its future strengths, approaches, experimentation being constantly in development, whether successful or not, as long as it's a successful failure, or a well-throught out experiment.
I'm keen on reader development, not just within the haiku community in all its forms, but new audiences, and those who despair of longer poetry or default to simple rhymes or doggerel.
I truly believe haiku can be a standard bearer to those audiences ostracised either by themselves, by schools and other educational facilities, or by aloof poets, who may never visit or revisit the rewarding power that is poetry (in all its forms).
About Roadrunner (
http://www.roadrunnerjournal.net/pages_all/aboutroadrunner.htm):
Roadrunner is a quarterly online journal seeking to publish the best and most diverse in English-language haiku (including senryu, zappai and short poetry inspired by haiku). There is so much that is right in this incredibly simple statement (forgetting terms that might be unfamiliar to some potential readers). Best and diverse, inclusive, widening the idea of what haiku is, and enabling readers, hopefully, and inspiring writers now, and future.
Roadrunner may have its fans and detractors, and I would never label myself eclectic as that term has been so much abused it feels like a cliché, but it showcases, and it pushes boundaries, yet does not exclude certain styles of haiku (I hope).
Just selecting some poems, otherwise this would be a very long post, and focusing on Roadrunner issue Issue 11.2:
there in the trees to begin with just before and just after love
Richard Gilbert
you watch those fingerprints tumble downriver
John Martone
an old word connects to a new one
the fame the dead
knew
Gary Hotham
celebrity
genitals
a preface
John Stevenson
amidst the black churning of stars my shudder
Jim Kacian
self-scrutiny
as deep
as the snorkel
allows
George Swede
a vast field
of clover
in defense of the realm
Patrick Sweeney
rhymes our small town
the to-fro pendulum of the Earth
winding
paul m.
testing my power real peaches in an imaginary winter
Jim Kacian
moon cradled you recall the voice of another I might be the audience
Richard Gilbert
In the incandescence let me let me read me to you
paul pfleuger jr
for all these storms and streams no north of the present
Philip Rowland
All these poems were deliberately picked without knowing who the author was, and I could have easily most of the poems, but that seemed silly as we have the magazine itself to read the rest.
These poems, and all the others cast a spell on me whether I understood them or not. Is that a crime? I think as a reader I have the right to like what I read, sometimes like what I know, and sometimes know what I like, irrespective of any peer pressure.
As a reader I found reading these yet again a truly rewarding experience that made me feel good, and stretched my understanding of what I think poetry is all about, or what haiku within poetry, is all about.
All my identities enjoyed reading these poems. ;-)
Alan
Alan, would you be willing to expand a bit on the importance of Roadrunner?