Quote from: Peter Yovu on May 26, 2011, 11:13:24 AM
How Do you Spell Haiku?
Have you read Martin Lucas' essay "Haiku as Poetic Spell"? What he discusses there has great relevance for what we've been looking at, and beyond. What I've been referring to as "sound image"-- (how a poem is experienced or felt prior to being taken up by the conscious mind), he calls "Poetic Spell". They are not exactly the same thing, in part because while Lucas speaks of the importance of sound (including, and emphasizing, rhythm) he also includes image, and says "It's possible to approach the Poetic Spell through both imagery and language". But he seems to give primacy to sound.
So one way to look at what we've been calling "vigorous language" (or "living language"), is to say it is language which casts a Poetic Spell. Of course, Lucas' essay is all about what that is.
Here's Jim Kacian's poem again, with some of Lucas' criteria for Poetic Spell below.
the high fizz nerve the low boom blood dead silence
There is a "significant contribution of word music/language effects, notably rhythm"
It is "essentially irrational—prose paraphrase not possible"
It "cannot be analyzed in terms of information content alone"
It is "an oral form, readily memorable"
He gives other elements as well, but from these alone, I daresay he would include Kacian's haiku with others, such as Duro Jaiye's
hatless the seeds of winter in the morning sky
and
sharpening this night of stars distant dogs
by Stuart Quine, as casting a Poetic Spell.
He says: "That's what I mean by Poetic Spell. Words that beat; words that flow". And, "This is what I want from haiku: something primitive; something rare; something essential. . . . It's not the information content that counts, it's the way that information is formed, cooked, and combined. Poetic spells don't tell us anything, they are something, they exist as objects of fascination in their own right". (My italics).
By the way, Lucas presents all this in opposition to what he calls the "International Formula" approach to haiku. But to learn more about that, you'll need to read his essay.
So, what do you think about this orientation to haiku? Or to any of the points Martin Lucas makes? Do you know of haiku which fit his view of the Poetic Spell?
His essay is included in Evolution, the latest volume from the Red Moon Anthology series. Or you can nibble the link below and find a version which, however, does not include his criteria, ("battle positions") contrasting the "International Formula" with Poetic Spell.
http://www.poetrysociety.org.nz/node/456