I am very interested in defining just what a haiku is, not the elements which I see posted to define haiku.
Would you say as I feel that describing haiku by its elements is not defining just what haiku is but, how to write a haiku?
ha i ku = seems like something a dove would say. One would have to listen very close to hear a three syllable count, because the word is spoken so fast in the English language.
What is very interest to me can you describe haiku without the elements?
Haiku to me has been a calendar of numbered entries.
Haiku is a journey of one's writing from beginning to end.
When I asked about the ku in haiku you said..
If it's an English-language forum about haiku I would say someone is using shorthand for 'haiku' ;)
Then you said down below that.
When members of a non-Japanese-language forum about haiku use the word 'ku' I would say they are referring to a single haiku poem.
Is this a misconception, did you mean to say, a single entry into one's haiku. That is if one defines haiku as a body of works.
We see all the time in other styles of poetry, where stanzas are numbered, some with roman numerals, the numbering of one's haiku is no more than marking stanzas.
Haiku is a haiku poet's journey, not just a single entry unless there was only time to write one entry.
I wrote this sentence in a discussion and I asked the beginners haiku class to offer the meaning of the sentence in detail.
Jewels is one playful kitten and now has become a part of my haiku twice...
The answer was not fourth coming, some turned it into a haiku others focused on every word in front of the word AND totally over read the last part of the sentence as if it did not exist.
The sentence describes, that Jewels is one playful kitten and has become a part of my body of works twice.
Now describing haiku without describing any elements of haiku, can one define it, as a body of works and is a single ku just an entry?
How does one define elements in haiku then stop short of defining just what the word haiku means?
ha i ku
I just saw how to add quotes and I am not use to the format as of yet.
Would you say as I feel that describing haiku by its elements is not defining just what haiku is but, how to write a haiku?
ha i ku = seems like something a dove would say. One would have to listen very close to hear a three syllable count, because the word is spoken so fast in the English language.
What is very interest to me can you describe haiku without the elements?
Haiku to me has been a calendar of numbered entries.
Haiku is a journey of one's writing from beginning to end.
When I asked about the ku in haiku you said..
If it's an English-language forum about haiku I would say someone is using shorthand for 'haiku' ;)
Then you said down below that.
When members of a non-Japanese-language forum about haiku use the word 'ku' I would say they are referring to a single haiku poem.
Is this a misconception, did you mean to say, a single entry into one's haiku. That is if one defines haiku as a body of works.
We see all the time in other styles of poetry, where stanzas are numbered, some with roman numerals, the numbering of one's haiku is no more than marking stanzas.
Haiku is a haiku poet's journey, not just a single entry unless there was only time to write one entry.
I wrote this sentence in a discussion and I asked the beginners haiku class to offer the meaning of the sentence in detail.
Jewels is one playful kitten and now has become a part of my haiku twice...
The answer was not fourth coming, some turned it into a haiku others focused on every word in front of the word AND totally over read the last part of the sentence as if it did not exist.
The sentence describes, that Jewels is one playful kitten and has become a part of my body of works twice.
Now describing haiku without describing any elements of haiku, can one define it, as a body of works and is a single ku just an entry?
How does one define elements in haiku then stop short of defining just what the word haiku means?
ha i ku
I just saw how to add quotes and I am not use to the format as of yet.